Member of MVC Consulting’s Senior Advisory Team Attains Scrum Master Certification

OAK BROOK, Ill., May 18, 2016 – As part of their commitment to meeting the ever-changing needs of our clients and the marketplace, MVC Consulting announced today that Senior Program Manager Dayton Kishimoto has earned his Certified Scrum Master (CSM) designation.

Kishimoto was trained by Mike Beedle, co-author of the Agile Manifesto and one of the country’s leading Agile strategists. This is just one more notable achievement in Kishimoto’s accomplished career which has spanned over 30 years and countless projects.

“We are proud of Dayton’s accomplishment,” says Mark Stroh, COO of MVC Consulting.  “As new software development methodologies, such as Agile, gain industry acceptance, we continue to invest in our team.  Dayton’s certification demonstrates our commitment to meet our client’s highly visible program management needs.”

Scrum is a well-known agile development method that provides a simple project management framework for organizing teams and their approach to system development. Agile’s benefits include improved quality, better opportunity for midcourse corrections, and improved customer satisfaction. Scrum’s relevance to the field of project management is further demonstrated by its continued popularity: “Scrum is far and away the most widely adopted flavor of Agile…For teams that have struggled to make accurate estimates or adapt to changes to the backlog, the attraction of Scrum isn’t just velocity” said Tom Grant and Diego Lo Giudice, Analysts for Forrester.


About MVC Consulting

For over 30 years, MVC Consulting has provided highly qualified program management and IT consulting services in the Chicagoland area. Our clients include leading pharmaceutical, insurance, distribution and manufacturing organizations. Our program managers lead highly complex projects, often integrating activities from both internal and external teams, resulting in on time and on budget delivery. We are a certified women owned business. Learn more at

Press Contact

Name: Kelly Burke

Mobile: 847.687.8976


Do PMOs Actually Work?

PMO Image


As I visit with clients, one of the most common, and divisive, topics of conversation seems to revolve around PMOs. In my experience, PMOs provide tremendous value when they are managed correctly and operate with the proper intent – that is to facilitate the completion of more projects on time and on budget with the fewest resources, while boosting organizational performance. As of 2014, roughly 80% of US companies, on average, had a PMO of some kind. Obviously, many leaders see the benefit, or at least a perceived benefit, in having PMO guidance, but many organizations are still hesitant.

What complicates the PMO discussion is the fact that many organizations simply don’t understand them. I have clients who view them as too rigid, adding additional “unneeded” oversight, and being too reliant on “meaningless methodology frameworks”. In addition to that, many organizations fail to realize that the purpose of a PMO can vary. A one size fits all approach isn’t the best approach. Also, companies may recognize a need and attempt to implement a PMO, but quickly abandon it if they don’t see immediate results.

First, PMOs do add oversight – which is one of their primary values. Recent studies have shown that less than half of all projects deliver on time, on budget, and with their intended benefits. This can be attributed to a variety of factors, but one in particular is that many projects don’t have an appropriate road map for success. A PMO group can outline a project map, implement an agreed upon methodology, and successfully manage checkpoints to ensure that targets are being hit. Adhering to a “prescribed” method may be met with resistance from within the organization, but PMOs can certainly provide the needed discipline, resource planning, and project focus to enable greater project success rates. The oversight doesn’t have to be rigid or prescribed. The good PMOs will take into account their organization’s culture and mold their frameworks to fit that, being open to input from stakeholders and Project Managers.

Next, the organization needs to determine what type of PMO will best meet its needs. Some PMOs exist solely to staff Project Managers and distribute resources to the business groups. Others serve as an all-encompassing project management cadre, consulting on each and every project, providing training to Project Managers, and establishing an overarching framework to follow for projects. The key to discerning which type of PMO is best depends on your company’s culture, project failures, and the intended goals.

Finally, patience is key. Of firms surveyed, 37% of companies with a PMO in place for less than 1 year reported better project success rates. Companies with a PMO in place for more than 4 years reported a 65% increased project success rate. The greatest gains are realized over time as PMOs integrate with the culture. PMO groups that are allowed the time to gain buy in from business groups and stakeholders are able to more effectively dictate program and project success. The organization that displays patience through the early years of a PMO can reap substantial benefits down the road. Studies show that CIOs should allow 3 years for a PMO to derive benefit.
PMOs are valuable, but they can only demonstrate that value if they are implemented with the right intentions, taking into account cultural aspects of the company, and are given time to develop. It has been recommended that newly formed PMOs start with overseeing well-defined pilot projects with a lot of oversight from business unit Project Managers. This will allow for the right amount of give and take so that both sides are contributing to making the PMO fit the company culture, and not the other way round. At the end of the day, a well organized PMO will help drive project success.